Introduction of Infected blood inquiry rishi sunak

The infected blood scandal that occurred in the UK during the 1970s and 80s has been called the worst treatment disaster in the history of the National Health Service. Thousands of patients contracted HIV and hepatitis after receiving contaminated blood products. Many lost their lives. The ongoing infected blood inquiry has investigated this tragedy. But victims and families continue demanding answers and adequate compensation from the government. Current Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has pledged to review the inquiry’s recommendations. This article will provide background on the scandal, summarize the inquiry findings, discuss Sunak’s response, and analyze what more can be done to support those impacted.

Background on the Contaminated Blood Scandal

During the 1970s and 80s, thousands of NHS patients received blood transfusions and products like clotting factors which turned out to be infected. This resulted in upwards of 2,400 deaths from HIV and hepatitis, with many more living with chronic health conditions.

The contaminated blood came from high-risk donors like prisoners and overseas sellers. Screening and treatment processes were inadequate to remove viruses and prevent transmission. Those affected included hemophiliacs, patients undergoing surgery, and women after childbirth.

When the scandal came to light, the government was slow to react or warn those potentially impacted. Victims felt ignored and blamed. It took until 2017 before an official inquiry was finally launched after decades of lobbying by dedicated campaign groups.

Victims and Families Impacted

Estimates indicate around 5,000 people with hemophilia were infected with hepatitis C. Of those, 1,243 were also co-infected with HIV. Both diseases were essentially a death sentence before treatment improved in the 1990s. 

Beyond those killed directly by the viruses, countless more saw their families torn apart following unexpected deaths, or had lives irreparably altered by long-term health conditions. The inquiry has heard heartbreaking statements from victims and families about lost loved ones and stolen futures.

For those still living, the stigma and psychological trauma continues today. Victim groups emphasize they were not merely statistics, but real people whose lives were turned upside down through no fault of their own. The government now has a moral duty to provide compensation and closure.

Previous Government Responses

Initially, the Thatcher administration proved reluctant to acknowledge or address the unfolding tragedy despite warnings from doctors. As the scale of infections became undeniable, some compensation was eventually provided to victims, albeit insufficient.

The government established trust funds in 1987 and 1993 to pay victims lump sums based on the severity of their conditions. But these trusts were capped at relatively low limits. Many families received less than £50,000, a fraction of what legal experts deemed appropriate.

In 2009, the Labour government asked Lord Archer to review the support programs. Though criticizing past responses as inadequate, Archer did not recommend expanding compensation. Victims remained unsatisfied and kept up the pressure.

Rishi Sunak’s Review of the Inquiry

After taking office in October 2022, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak committed to reviewing the findings and recommendations of the infected blood inquiry with “fresh eyes”. The inquiry’s final report had called for far more compensation for victims and their families.

Chaired by Sir Brian Langstaff, the inquiry described past compensation as “wrong” and said a framework should be established to calculate appropriate payout amounts based on loss of income and life expectancy. With many still lacking closure decades later, the report urged Sunak to act with greater urgency and compassion.

Families have praised Sunak for appearing open-minded but remain cautiously skeptical given years of disappointment and inaction. Sunak is expected to deliver his response to the inquiry’s proposals in 2023. Victims groups will closely scrutinize the level of compensation offered and how swiftly it is provided.

Recommendations for Compensation

The infected blood inquiry recommended a four-tier compensation framework with specific guidelines:

Tier 1 – £100,000 lump sum payment for those infected but still living

Tier 2 – Bereaved spouses or partners should receive £50,000 – £100,000

Tier 3 – Dependent children be awarded £25,000 when a parent died

Tier 4 – £5000 support payments for those facing serious financial hardship currently

These represent minimum amounts that should be paid based on the inquiry’s findings. Many victims advocate compensation in the top tiers should in fact be even higher to truly account for their losses.

The inquiry also emphasized compensation should be made available quickly, rather than families having to wait months or years longer. Streamlining and simplifying application processes will demonstrate real commitment to upholding justice.

Ongoing Support for Victims

In addition to improved compensation, ongoing medical monitoring, treatment, and mental health support must remain available to victims and their families.

Many are still dealing with long-term health implications today because of the infected blood. Counseling, peer support groups, specialist healthcare, and other services remain vital to managing lasting trauma and conditions. Funding must continue securing this assistance.

Widows and partners who lost loved ones also need specialized bereavement services. Financial and legal advice can further help those navigating applications for compensation or benefits. Support should align with individual needs.

Public Reaction and Campaigns

The infected blood scandal has received increased public attention and sympathy following chilling inquiry testimony from victims in recent years. The inquiry’s hearings have been livestreamed and covered extensively in media.

Campaign groups like the Contaminated Blood Scandal have worked diligently alongside victims to pressure the government for transparency, apologies, and fair compensation. Charities like the Terrence Higgins Trust have promoted public understanding.

Many politicians have backed reform, with MPs stating victims were “badly let down” and that financial responses must improve. However, some have argued caps are still required to avoid opening the government to “open-ended liability”. But most agree past compensation fell painfully short.

Lessons Learned

The inquiry’s final report stressed the infected blood scandal must serve as a lesson about properly managing risks in healthcare and promptly handling problems when they arise.

It highlighted:

  • Following up concerns raised by experts and clinicians
  • Implementing adequate blood screening measures proactively rather than reactively
  • Exercising caution when utilizing higher-risk donor sources
  • Communicating transparently with patients about potential dangers
  • Responding rapidly with compensation when injuries occur

Had these lessons been learned earlier, much suffering could have been avoided. We must vigilantly apply what the inquiry exposed to safeguard healthcare in the future.

What More Can Be Done

While Rishi Sunak’s review represents progress, the infected blood inquiry and victim support groups have emphasized more work remains across a few key areas:

Compensation – Payouts must properly reflect loss of income and life expectancy based on actuarial tables, potentially exceeding current recommendations.

Speed – Funds need to reach victims faster, avoiding unnecessary delays. Bureaucracy must not prolong suffering.

Criminal charges – Consider pressing criminal charges against officials and companies criminally negligent regarding tainted imports and lack of donor screening.

Documentation – Guarantee all documents relating to the scandal are preserved and accessible through the inquiry archive.

Apology – Require a formal apology from Sunak explicitly acknowledging the pain caused to victims and families.  


The infected blood inquiry stands as one of the NHS’ darkest chapters. Though it can never undo the damage done, Rishi Sunak now has the opportunity to provide survivors and families with a measure of closure through fair compensation and continual support. By learning from this tragedy, we can hopefully prevent similar injustices in the future. Those impacted deserve both justice and a secure legacy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *